evaluacion institucional

La primera tarea, la he planteado, como sepuede ver







Submission ID: 10
Las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones con enfoque a la educación
TIP: Use a local text editor to write your review, and then select/copy the information below. This way, in case of a network outage or some other problem, you won't lose the review.
Recommendation:
Reject: Content inappropriate to the conference or has little merit
XProbable Reject: Basic flaws in content or presentation or very poorly written
Marginal Tend to Reject: Not as badly flawed; major effort necessary to make acceptable but content well-covered in literature already
Marginal Tend to Accept: Content has merit, but accuracy, clarity, completeness, and/or writing should and could be improved in time
Clear Accept: Content, presentation, and writing meet professional norms; improvements may be advisable but acceptable as is
Must Accept: Candidate for outstanding submission. Suggested improvements still appropriate
Submission Categorization:
Highly theoretical
X Tends towards theoretical
Balanced theory and practice
Tends toward practical
Highly practical
Overall Value Added to the Field:
Check as many as appropriate
New information
Valuable confirmation of present knowledge
Clarity to present understanding
New perspective, issue, or problem definition
X Not much
Other
Reviewer Familiarity with Subject Matter:
Relates to the confidence you have in your review
Low
X Moderate